Liability and damages evaluations are designed around the parameters of the case. Case complexity, number of parties, and damages potential are among the variables which determine the scope of the research. Research methods involve an adversarial approach with arguments on behalf of the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s).
Case Strength Evaluation Research
Case Strength Evaluation Research evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of a case prior to mediation, arbitration, or trial. Magnus analyzes detailed information about plaintiff and defense positions on liability and damages. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies are utilized.
Mock Trial Research
Mock Trials are the most comprehensive of the qualitative methods used for case evaluation. A Mock Trial allows lengthy presentations of plaintiff and defense cases, including live or previously recorded witness testimony.
Mock Arbitration Panel/Bench Trial
Mock Bench Trials and Mock Arbitration Panels evaluate the likely decision making process of the judge or arbitrators. Several surrogate triers of fact are utilized to provide input which forms the basis for Magnus’ feedback and recommendations. Participants render individual decisions as well as engage in group discussions.
Mediation Rehearsal & Coaching
Mock meditations consist of plaintiff and defense presentations to a panel of mediators who individually report their impressions of the attorney presentations and the case facts. Mediators also engage in a focused group discussion moderated by the consultant.
Silhouette Jury Panel
Silhouette Jury Panels provide day to day analysis of a trial’s progress. Silhouette Jurors are recruited to closely approximate the characteristics of actual jurors. They observe the trial alongside the jury and form their opinions on the evidence. Daily feedback to the attorney by the consultant provides the attorney with an opportunity to refine his or her case to ensure the best result. Furthermore, when the real jurors are permitted to ask questions, Magnus will evaluate the nature and underlying issues raised by the jurors’ questions.
Trial Progress Evaluation
Similar to the Silhouette Jury Panel, Trial Progress Evaluation provides a day by day analysis of the trial. In Trial Progress Evaluation, the trial is observed by one of Magnus’ Research Associates or Consultants instead of Silhouette Jury panel members.
Post Verdict Interviews
Post Verdict Interviews, when permitted by the Court, provide a wealth of information to the trial team. Determining how the actual jury reached its decision in a case can be most helpful in retrying cases which have been lost, mistried, overturned on appeal, or when a series of related cases is being tried.
Verdict Perception™ is Magnus’ proprietary research methodology used to evaluate liability and/or damages. This methodology involves a minimum of 2 online deliberations groups of up to 8 participants per group. The participants view case presentations (most often pre-recorded) and exhibits, answer survey questions, and deliberate. Participants see and hear each other during deliberations in a secure research environment. The proceedings are recorded for analysis of results and client viewing. As with all of Magnus’ research methodologies, the participants are jury eligible citizens of the trial venue. Magnus prepares a written report based on the research results.
Verdict Perception™ can be customized, depending the case specifics.
Watch the video below to see an example of a Case Strength Evaluation Research and Mock Trial